Testzon Review

testzon

Testzon is a discount website where sellers offer their products at a discount or totally free. It has a huge audience who regularly visits to check the products available and to purchase them. 

Why Customers use Testzon?

Customers or the regular visitors of Testzon consist of everyday people looking for discounted products. Usually, products are advertised at a heavy discount or totally free; customers are looking for these deals to save their money and benefit from the offer on testzon.

Why sellers use Testzon?

Amazon sellers who want to get reviews or improve their sales velocity advertise their products on Testzon. The purpose of increasing the sales velocity is to improve their ranking to get more organic orders.

Is it beneficial to use Testzon?

An Amazon seller who just started selling or does not have enough sales looks for ways to increase daily orders. On the other side, customers on Amazon focus on these two major factors for purchasing a product:

  1. Ranking of the Product
  2. Reviews of the Product 

Usually, the sellers with low sales lack in one of the above two or in both. You may ask how the ranking concerns the buyer; well, buyers can only purchase the products they can see. When a buyer searches for a product on Amazon, hundreds of sellers offer it, but customers only check the top lists. So, until you have a good product ranking, your product listing is not visited many times, so you are getting low sales. No matter how much excellent quality or low-priced Product you are offering on Amazon, you will not be able to get good sales without a good product ranking. As far as the reviews are concerned, the customers on Amazon read those reviews to check if the previous customers liked or disliked the product. In other terms, the reviews reflect the customer experience and quality of the product. 

To improve your product ranking and get more reviews on Amazon, you need more sales. Since sellers can’t get these essentials sales, they offer their products for free or at heavy discounts on websites like Testzon. You can call sales obtained by this method Assisted sales. More are the assisted sales you get higher will be your sales velocity. Due to this increased sales velocity, Amazon will also improve your product ranking so that more customers can check your Product and purchase it.

How to get reviews from Testzon?

As per Amazon policy, you cannot offer an incentive or give a free Product in exchange for a review. So, it is not possible to ensure that all the buyers who purchased your product from Testzon, will also leave a review. However, you can request the buyers on Testzon to write an honest review about your Product (please note asking for an honest review is not against Amazon policies). 

While requesting the buyers make an emotional appeal, tell them that their review will benefit your business and help the other customers to know about this brand. Usually, the customers don’t want to waste time writing reviews; however, you can persuade them to write a review with an emotional message.

How to select the product testers?

Testers or customers interested in purchasing your Product will apply on your advertisement on Testzon, and then you have to decide who you want to allow for purchasing your Product. Check the Amazon profiles of these customers; check if they have left reviews previously or not. 

If it is a new profile or has not left any reviews, chances are that he/she will not write a review for you. If the buyer leaves detailed reviews with images and videos of the products they purchased, this means that the customer often writes reviews and will also leave a review for you. 

However, if a customer is writing reviews on every purchase made from Amazon, then there are high chances that Amazon may find this suspicious and block his/her account from writing more reviews. So, try to avoid such customers.

Offering discount coupons or refunding through PayPal?

Creating a discount coupon and letting your customers use it may seem easier as compared to asking them to purchase your product at full price and then sending them a refund through PayPal. But if we discuss this in terms of impact on ranking, the purchase done at full price has a higher impact than the purchase done with a discount code. Also, if a product is purchased using 50% or higher discount coupon, then the customer’s reviews are shown as non-verified reviews on Amazon.  If you don’t have PayPal, then you can also use Gift Cards or Stripe for refunding.

Don’t give the direct link of your Product

The customers on Testzon will need the link to your Product for purchasing it. Should you give the direct link or not? 

If you give your Product’s direct link, the customer will click on it, visit your product page, and check out immediately. In all of this, you have missed the keyword on which you wanted to improve your ranking. Instead of this direct link, you can use a super URL. 

Super URL

The Super URL has embedded your target keyword and your Product’s ASIN in it. If the customers click on the Super URL and go to your product listing, on the backend, it appears as if they have typed your target keyword on Amazon and then opened your Product. This will also improve your Product’s ranking on that keyword, and this has no difference in the customers’ purchase process.

Hijackers

Some people who purchased your Product (at a heavily discounted price) from these discount websites later may try to resell it by attaching with your listing. They are called hijackers. 

Since they are not selling a counterfeit but the original Product they initially purchased from you, you will not be able to knock them off from your listing. To avoid such a situation, don’t allow the customers from Testzon to purchase more than one unit of your Product. By limiting the number of units a customer can purchase, you will also save yourself from these hijackers.

These are some great reviews about Testzon:

https://www.reviewercollective.com/product-testing-sites/amazon-review-site-testzon/

https://www.scamadviser.com/check-website/testzon.com

Is Testzon recommended?

This website is legit, and you can use it, but do not allow bulk purchasing of your Product because this will attract hijackers. Follow all the tips shared in this article, and you will not have any problem dealing with customers on Testzon. You can maximize testzon benefit with Samurai.Social by improving your influencer on amazon,.

Read More

WP Rocket vs W3 Total Cache – Which One is Better?

WP Rocket and W3 Total Cache are arguably the two best caching plugins available for WordPress. But when you are unsure which caching plugin will do the best caching job for you that’s where a head-to-head comparison article fits properly. 

So, if you are looking for the WP Rocket vs W3 Total Cache comparison and test case, then you are on the right page. 

Before diving into the plugin details and comparison part, let’s talk about caching and how it helps to improve your site performance.  

What is caching and how does a caching plugin help?

Caching can be a hardware or software component that stores data for future requests to be served faster than the initial response. Technically, a website cache is a temporary location for copies of website files such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and images. 

Later these files will be served from the browser cache location (typically a cache subdirectory under the directory of your browser) to improve the page loading experience. 

This image explains the caching mechanism thoroughly.

What-is-caching

Fortunately, as a WordPress user, you have access to a wide range of caching plugins that can significantly improve your site performance. Nowadays, caching plugins are more than capable of caching website resources. They provide a complete site optimization package starting from code minification, control javascript, CSS execution time, media control, etc.

It’s up to you, how you can analyze the current website performance, find out the bloats, and configure caching plugin settings to improve those areas. Regardless of your preferred plugin, here are the key benefits of using a caching plugin for WordPress.

  1. Provide faster experience to users and search engine crawlers.
  2. Help you to increase the performance and speed of your site.
  3. Reduce caching load on your server.
  4. Saves bandwidth.

As mentioned earlier, there are a ton of caching plugins available. WP Rocket and W3 Total Cache stand out among the others and are widely preferred by WordPress users. 1+ million active installations to date speak a lot about the popularity of these two caching plugins.

So, in this post, we will find out which caching plugin is better with the help of head-to-head feature comparison and based on test results.

#1. Introduction to WP Rocket

WP Rocket is arguably the #1 premium caching plugin for WordPress sites. It is one of the widely used caching plugins and used by over 1,494,000 WordPress sites on the globe. You might be using your favorite caching plugin for now, but you should at least consider testing WP Rocket to realize the ability of this plugin. 

We internally use WP Rocket on clients’ sites and that helped us drastically improve their site performance

WP-Rocket

#2. Introduction to W3 Total Cache

If you are looking for an easy to configure, user-friendly, and free caching plugin then W3 Total Cache is the right choice for you. This plugin has over 1 million WordPress installations to date. W3 Total Cache comes with a lot of features such as managing high web server performance, CDN configuration, Minification, Inline Js & CSS, and a lot more.

As we proceed through this article, you will know about the features of W3 Total Cache and the impact on optimizing your site performance.

W3-Total-Cache

WP Rocket vs W3 Total Cache: Which Plugin Does Better Caching Job?

In this section, we are comparing each feature of both plugins based on availability, user-friendliness, and efficiency. This way, you will know what you can achieve with both of these plugins and pick your preferred one.

Features of WP Rocket vs W3 Total Cache:

#1. Browser Caching: It will enable the storing of frequently accessed resources into the local memory of the user’s device. By enabling browser caching you are asking the browsers to store commonly used but rarely updated files into their local cache directory. 

You don’t have much to do to active browser caching in WP Rocket. Activating the plugin will automatically enable it and then you can set the cache lifespan under the basic cache option.

Cache-Life-Span

W3 Total Cache on the other hand gives you extended control over how you want to configure browser caching for your website. You can set general caching controls, caching for CSS & JavaScript files, HTML and XML files as well as media files.

The caching interface of W3 Total Cache looks like this.

general-w3-total-cache

#2. Minification and Concatenation: With minification, you aim to remove unnecessary characters from the source code to lower page size. On WP Rocket, the minification configuration is simple. All you have to enable the minification and the plugin will do the rest of the job for you. 

On WP Rocket the minification configuration is easier because you don’t have to find the best combination that works for your site.

minification-wp-rocket

W3 Total Cache gives you separate minification control for HTML & XML, CSS and JavaScript files. Enabling and disabling of minification for each of these modules are independent. You can set minification methods, set the minification engine’s location, enable HTTP/2 push, etc.

#3. Database Optimization: Reducing database response time is important for improving site performance. Fast database response means your server is getting the required address of page resources quickly and that helps in improving overall page loading time.

WP Rocket has an inbuilt database optimization module. You can configure post-cleanup settings, comments cleanup, transients cleanup, and one-click database cleanup to reduce the overhead of the database table.

Database-cleanup-WP-Rocket

W3 Total Cache however only provides database object caching, you won’t be able to control database optimization. Additionally, you can install a plugin like WP-Optimize from the WordPress repository. With this plugin, you will be able to do all the jobs you can do with WP Rocket plus delete rows from the database table with safety.

#4. Image Optimization & Lazy Loading:  To improve page performance you need to reduce image size as much as possible without sacrificing the quality of the image. Another important mechanism you can use to improve the page testing tool’s grade is by delaying the loading of an image only when visible. 

WP Rocket has an inbuilt feature to enable lazy loading for images. You don’t have to do anything manually, activating lazy loading will assign loading as “Lazy” tags in the site images. In case you want any image to be excluded then you can provide an image URL to exclude it from lazy loading. 

media-WP-rocket

As for image optimization, WP Rocket doesn’t have an integrated module; instead, you need to subscribe to imagify which is developed by the same company who created WP Rocket. Imagify will optimize all the images on your site, automatically. You can control the quality of the image delivery when it makes more sense.

W3 Total Cache has the option to defer image loading as well but it doesn’t come with a module to compress the images of your site. You will have to use another plugin for image optimization. You will have a couple of good plugins like Smush, EWWW Image Optimizer, etc.

lazyload-w3-total-cache

#5. Google Font Optimization: Google fonts are easy to implement, look beautiful on screen but they have a huge impact on page performance. Google fonts are already optimized for delivery, but when you get the configuration wrong, your visitor might need to wait a bit to see them appearing, doesn’t look like a good idea for user impression.

With WP Rocket installed, you can improve performance by helping browsers discover fonts in CSS files. You will need to find those fonts which need to be downloaded by the browser as the connection starts and thus the font displaying process will be smoother.

All you need to mention is the Google font (any font) URLs that you want to preload as a browser initiates a connection with your web server.

Google-font-preload-WP_rocket

W3 Total Cache doesn’t have the option to remove or optimize Google fonts. Other plugins such as Asset clean up might do the job for you once you decide to integrate this plugin with W3 Total Cache.

#6. Defer Javascript Loading: It means trying to defer javascript execution until the page loads to help other parts of the page load faster. It is applied by changing the type and src attributes of <script > elements on the HTML page. 

With WP Rocket deferring javascript loading is as simple as checking to defer javascript options and you are all set. Doing so if anything breaks or behaves abnormally on your site you can find those specific javascript and exclude them from applying the defer attribute. 

defer-javascript-WP-Rocket

In W3 Total Cache you get more control over how you intend to load the JavaScript files on your site. You can apply four different strategies to load minified JavaScript into your <head> and <body> section;

  1. Default (Blocking)
  2. Non-blocking (using JS)
  3. Non-blocking (using defer)
  4. Non-blocking (using asynchronous delivery)
Defer-javascript-W3-Total-Cache

This module of W3 Total Cache can be really useful when a lot of javascript gets executed once your page is being loaded. You can delay or asynchronously load javascript to improve site loading time as well as get the green light on the best practices.

#7. CDN Support: CDN doesn’t only improve the delivery speed of website resources, it prevents site crashes in the event of sudden traffic spikes. Applying CDN is a great idea because it reduces the server workload by distributing the bandwidth across multiple servers. Not only that, the nearest server station makes the browsing experience significantly smoother. 

Both WP Rocket and W3 Total Cache come with the CDN configuration module and that only takes you to add the CNAME record from your preferred CDN service. On WP Rocket you serve specific files using CDN and exclude individual files whenever necessary. 

CDN-WP-Rocket

W3 Total Cache provides greater control over the CDN settings. You can choose what kind of resources to be hosted with CDN which is something similar to WP Rocket, but the ability to custom resources such as minified javascript and CSS files is a great advantage. You will be able to add canonical HTTP headers to the asset files as well.

You can exclude all kinds of file types from being served through CDN, you can also exclude users’ roles, disable CDN on SSL active pages, and set cookieless domain with a single click.

CDN-W3-Total-Cache

Additional Features Comparison:

Apart from the features mentioned above, there are a couple more areas where we can compare these two caching plugins. You will find them below in the table. 

FeatureWP RocketW3 Total Cache
Gzip Compression YesYes
Cache Preloading YesYes
Cloudflare compatibilityYesYes (No quick configuration)
Page CachingYesYes
Disable EmojisYesYes
Sitemap Preloading YesNo
DNS PrefetchingYesNo
HTML & XML MinificationNoYes
Database Caching NoYes
Object CachingNoYes
Lazy Load Google MapNoYes (Extension Required) 
Remove Query StringYesYes
Cache Group ControlNo Yes
E-commerce FriendlyYesYes
Multisite FriendlyYesNo
Multilingual CompatibilityYesNo
AMP SupportYesYes
SSL SupportNoYes
Render Blocking OptimizationYesYes
Server Performance UpgradeNoYes

Now you can see in terms of features there are ups and downs for both plugins, but thanks to WordPress extension capability you can get the job done with other specific task plugins and bring a better version of your website performance with combined power.

That being said, let’s move on to the use case experience of these two plugins and try to figure out who gives you more flexibility but less stress while optimizing site performance.

User Experience – WP Rocket vs W3 Total Cache 

In terms of user experience, W3 Total Cache is populated with lots of options to configure however they are organized under specific sections. If you are a beginner, it can be the best plugin given it’s available for free but it asks for an understanding of what’s going on behind the site’s background when you are applying those settings.

WP Rocket however is simple, has a clean interface, and easy to apply and test the settings because the modules are packed into single-click control. For example, when you enable the JavaScript minification, all you have to do is check the js minification checkbox, save the setting and that’s it. However, that reduces the flexibility of WP Rocket. You can enable minification but you can’t control where & how you want to serve those minified files. 

Risk Factor – WP Rocket vs W3 Total Cache

Apparently, there is a low percentage of risk when using these caching plugins because even if you have broken something in your site (mostly layout), uninstalling the plugin should get your site back to its normal state, unless the plugin has added irrelevant codes into you .htaccess files or any other core files. 

Apart from that, we still consider there might be a risk while configuring a caching plugin. If something is misconfigured and forces you to uninstall the plugin, well then where’s the benefit of having a caching plugin. In the end, for better performance, you will end up installing the same plugin once again. 

In W3 Total Cache, I didn’t find any option to revert the settings automatically to their idle state rather you have to do it manually. WP Rocket has an inbuilt safe mode utility which you can find during the uninstall note. It’s a great module to fix your broken site’s layout and restart your configuration with more care.

WP-Rocket-Safe-Mode

Pricing Comparison – WP Rocket vs W3 Total Cache

WP Rocket is a premium plugin. That’s not good news if you are looking for a great caching plugin free of cost, but I must admit this plugin proves to provide value to the users and worth the money you pay for it.

On the other hand, W3 Total Cache is a freemium plugin where you will get most of the important features in the free version. For extended features such as CSS Render blocking, Full site delivery via CDN you need to go for the premium version. 

Find the pricing plans for both plugin below: 

WP Rocket is currently offering these 3 pricing plans:

  1. Single ($49, One year support for 1 website)
  2. Plus ($99, One year support for 3 websites)
  3. Infinite ($249, One year support for unlimited websites)

W3 Total Cache is generally free but has 1 plan to add extended features:

  1. Total Cache Pro ($99/year for a single site)

Support – WP Rocket vs W3 Total Cache

WP Rocket provides you all the documentation and video guides along with the plugin so that you can learn how to get the best out of this plugin and improve your site performance to the max level. Apart from that their support team is super active and ready to help you whenever you ask for any kind of help whether it be the plugin settings or anything related to it.

Support of W3 Total Cache is not as efficient as WP Rocket. You might have to look for configuration guides elsewhere or purchase their premium support for stuff like plugin configuration, CDN configuration, Hosting environment troubleshooting, etc. I have added a screenshot of their services below.

Performance Comparison – WP Rocket vs W3 Total Cache

Performance is not something predictable and we can’t declare which plugin performs better. From our internal experience, we can say it depends on the website structure and the resources it has to serve per request. WP Rocket brings out an immediate performance improvement with the sites that are built with optimized themes such as Astra, Generatepress, etc. 

However, for sites built using page builders such as Elementor, WP Bakery, W3 Total Cache seems to have a better output than WP Rocket, which I believe is because of more control we have on the W3 Total Cache plugin. Again, this is only according to our internal tests and can vary on your side. The key is to find the best combination of settings on each site because there are no idle settings that work on every site. 

Below you will find test outputs of a site hosted on Siteground and using the Generatepress theme. To increase the payload I had a long-form of content, media, and advertisement on the page and tested with both WP Rocket and W3 Total Cache to find out which works better.

The test was performed on a page of gamespec.tech and I get the following output for both plugins.

Test result with WP Rocket: 

  1. Page Speed Insight Score: 
    1. 99 for desktop
    2. 94 for mobile
Test-Result-WP-Rocket

Test result with W3 Total Cache:

  1. Page Speed Insight Score
    1. 91 for desktop
    2. 83 for mobile 
Speed-Test-W3-Total-Cache

Final thoughts:

As we discussed in the article, if you’re a WordPress user, installing a cache plugin improves your site performance and load time. That being said, choosing one caching plugin between WP Rocket Vs W3 total cache is again, a tough decision. 

The test case and feature explanation should help you find the right one for you. Whichever you choose, I can guarantee your site will significantly do better in terms of performance. If your budget doesn’t help to get WP Rocket, go for the W3 total cache, and if you’re someone who’s looking for quick setup and industry level support then choose WP Rocket instead.

So which one are you going for? Do you have experience with any other plugin that can match these two? Let us know your experience so far in the comment section below.

Read More

Zerys VS TextBroker – Comparison Between Two Leading Content Development Sites

Finding the right content writing service provider is more challenging than it may seem. If you manage to pick the right content site, developing quality content is easy. On the other hand, choosing an inexperienced freelancer can derail your entire project and unnecessarily complicate things. 

To help you find the best writers, we compared two premium content writing sites to make your decision easier, providing insights into the features, advantages, and cons of both services.

TextBroker VS Zerys

TextBroker and Zerys go head to head in terms of compatibility and expertise in unique content development.

Zerys

Zerys is an ideal content-developing platform for small and medium business owners as well as freelancers. You can find and hire freelance writers via its website, or you may post a project and wait for interested writers to reach out to you.

The best part of choosing Zerys is that it allows you to request a revision if you are not satisfied with the content. Only after a writer delivers satisfactory content do you have to make a payment.

This site essentially acts as a broker that connects you to a freelance writer and accepts payments on their behalf. Zerys does not edit the content developed by its writers unless you make an additional payment for editing. You must be a competent writer yourself and have a good grasp of the language to ensure the content meets your standards.

Overall, Zerys is a helpful platform with many skilled writers and practical tools to advertise, manage, and pay for your content.
However, there is a lot of confusion about the accuracy of this site. It is difficult to determine a writer’s ability as most do not provide sufficient information or portfolios.

Key Features:

  • Zerys has thousands of freelance writers registered with them.
  • Dedicated writers are available for different content types.
  • Most writers on Zerys demand a relatively lower fee for their services.

Pros

  • Writers on Zerys have a rating on a scale of 1 to 5. It makes it easy for employers to determine their skills despite minimal profile information.
  • You only pay for your order when you are 100% satisfied with the content.
  • You can find writers who charge as low as $0.01 per word. However, you may need to pay more if you are looking for unique and high-quality content.

Cons:

  • You need to pay an additional fee to avail of their editing services.
  • The star ratings help you identify an excellent writer or an inferior performer, but you cannot judge writers with three or four stars based only on their ratings. You will need to try them for yourself.
  • Zerys does not include project management as a part of its service.

TextBroker

This content development site offers custom content through its various platforms in ten different languages. If you want your content to be in US English, visit textbroker.com. For French content, the website is textbroker.fr.

The brand ensures that all the writers are from the target country of their platform.

Key Features:

  • Available in various extensions, each designed for a specific language.
  • It connects you to several writers in only a few minutes.

Pros

  • You can find skilled writers at a low cost.
  • Allows you to get content in 10 different languages.

Cons

  • It takes a commission of 35% of the total fee. It means you need to pay 35% more than what your writer is charging.
  • Does not offer project management.
  • Requesting a revision is very complicated. They try their best not to accept revision requests.

Conclusion

When hiring a content developer, you want the process to be as straightforward as possible. You surely do not want to hand your project over to an inexperienced or incompetent writer.

So, it makes sense to take some time to identify the perfect writer for your project.

We have compared two popular content service providers, and it is safe to say that Zerys is a better alternative.

Other Content Development Site You May Like

Zerys might have the edge over TextBroker, but it does not mean it is the best option available. Neither of these two sites offers complete content development and project management services.

IIf you are not satisfied with either of these sites, you might check out our Content Refined Review.
Content Refined services leave behind many leading service providers in the industry regarding content development, management, and marketing services.

Read More

TextBroker VS Constant Content- Which Is a Better Content Writing Platform

Content is the key ingredient to successful marketing. Any business organization requires content creation to inform people about its offerings, products, and services.

Online businesses need much more content to describe their products and services in detail as their customers are mostly visiting them on the other side of a screen.

Content development for a business website requires a certain level of expertise. The content has to be well optimized for popular search engines and, of course, well-written. 

For most small and medium-sized businesses, hiring a full-time professional writer is not an option. However, they can always assign their projects to freelance writers with a reasonable budget.

You can find thousands of skilled writers at various content development platforms. In this article, we compare two websites where you can easily connect to a freelance writer.

Constant Content

Constant Content is a website where people search for content developers to find a suitable candidate for the job.

It is one of the most expensive content development platforms as its writers set the price for each project. On top of that, Constant Content charges 35% of the cost, so the writers include that in their selling price.

There are three categories of writers on this platform. Some freelancers upload their articles into a catalog and wait for interested buyers to contact them. You might find a helpful blog in these catalogs, but it’s not a safe bet.

You may also post your projects on this site and wait for a suitable freelance writer to respond, but they will decide the fees.

Finally, there is a pool of writers where you can choose a skilled candidate based on the content you want. Here, the writers can demand high compensation, but at least you get several candidates to choose from.

What makes this site a formidable competitor in the industry is each of its writers has impeccable grammar. You can be sure that you are getting a piece that is well-written. 

Pros

  • You can get content on just about any topic.
  • This site offers you a pool of writers capable of developing concise content.
  • You can place an order in multiple ways.
  • You can get grammatically perfect content from this site

Cons

  • The writers get to decide the price of a project.
  • It has a very lengthy review process.

TextBroker 

TextBroker is a unique content development platform where you can connect to the best writers as this site offers more than 100,000 professionals.

Although TextBroker does not categorize its writers, you can check their deliverability to some extent through the client ratings.

Most importantly, this content broker offers its services in 10 different languages. TextBroker ensures that each writer on its platforms is from the respective country.

This site also offers management services at $25.00 per project.

You can have your content created at a much lower price than Constant Content. The highest-tier writers charge up to 25 cents per word.

Pros

  • You get to choose the perfect candidate from a pool of more than 100,00 writers.
  • It offers 10 different platforms. Each dedicated to a specific language.
  • The best writers do not charge more than 25 cents per word on this platform.
  • It allows you to place an open order and hire a suitable writer among those who are interested.

Cons

  • It has a higher commission rate compared to its competitors.
  • The project management services are priced too high.
  • Very little information is available about the writers.

Conclusion

Everybody wants the best value for their money. When paying for your business content, you expect it to be exceptionally well-written. The last thing you want as a business owner is to hire an incompetent and inexperienced writer.

Hopefully, this article will help you decide which of these sites is a better choice.

After comparing their pricing and offerings, it’s clear that TextBroker is way cheaper than Constant Content. But, with the second option, you can get better quality content.

If either of these sites does not seem right for you, don’t worry. There are plenty of other content development platforms where you can find the right candidate.

Content Refined– A Better Alternative

Despite providing grammatically correct and well-structured content, there are several disadvantages of hiring a writer on Constant Content. On the other hand, you may choose TextBroker as it suits your budget, but you will likely need to compromise quality.

You must check out our Content Refined Review to learn more about this better alternative to TextBroker and Constant Content. Besides providing complete development and management services, Content Refined is an expert in marketing your article and blogs.

Read More

WriterAccess VS TextBroker- Comparison Between Two Similar Content Development Sites

Despite so many advancements in AI and technology over the past few years, one thing remains constant. Content is priceless.

No technology can develop 100% original content. To do that, you need to tap into human intelligence and talent.

Having well-written and original content on your blogs and web pages benefits you in several ways. It is essential for proper SEO, better search engine ranking, and effective reader engagement.

However, developing such content can take hours or even days. As a business owner, you cannot afford so much time for writing blogs or other content for your company.

That is when content writers and service providers are helpful. You can hire a freelance content writer to do the job on your behalf.

Several content development platforms are out there, where you can find thousands of skilled writers. But you must choose the right candidate for better results.

Let’s compare two prime competitors of this industry!

WriterAcess

WriterAccess offers you a pool of over 15,000 professional writers accessible at a meager monthly fee.

There are six categories of writers in this pool based on their skills and experience. Each category of writers has a fixed rate per word. However, you may announce a flat fee that you will pay for a particular project.

It is up to the writer if they want to work at your rate.

With more than 300 categories and skillsets, WriterAccess makes it super easy for you to find the perfect talent for your project.

You can enjoy a free 14-day trial on WriterAccess. After the trial period, you will need to subscribe to its premium plan for $39/month, but this does not require a minimum commitment from you.

This platform also offers project management services, including proofreading and editing. However, you need to pay an additional fee of $349 to take advantage of its management services.

Pros

  • Unlike the majority of content development sites, WriterAccess does not rush you to hire a writer.
  • It is one of the few sites that provide overall content management services.
  • The platform allows you to post your project directly to its pool.

Cons

  • The management service fees are too high. Other sites out there offer even more advanced services at a cheaper cost, like Content Refined.
  • The writers’ pool is much smaller than other alternatives.

TextBroker

Unlike WriterAccess, TextBroker does not require you to pay a monthly access fee. You can sign up as a client, search for writers, and place orders without any expense.

This platform does not feature different categories, but writers are rated based on their skills and performance. 

Being one of the first content sites, TextBroker offers you more professional writers than most of its competitors, over 100,000.

This platform handles your entire project, but its management services are even costlier than that of WriterAccess. TextBroker charges $25.00 for managing each of your projects.

Textbroker states that the final project price depends on the type, scope, length, HTML tagging, keyword requirements, and the amount of research done. So, you would not know how much your project cost are if you order management services.

Pros

  • TextBroker is different from other writing platforms because it acts as a typical broker. So, the writers get total freedom to use their skills and develop unique content.
  • You can find writers suitable for just about any topic.
  • It allows you to place an open order so that it is visible to all the writers.

Cons

  • It has a relatively higher commission rate.
  • Its management services are too expensive.
  • There is not enough information about the writers and their works.

Conclusion

Now that you have learned about both the advantages and disadvantages of these two sites, you may be able to choose the best option for your business.

Comparing the two platforms, TextBroker is cheaper than WriterAccess. However, the latter delivers more high-quality content.

So, it is up to you to decide which is more suitable for your requirements and budget.

If none of these sites seem capable of serving your purpose, it is not the end of the world.

Other Options You Shall Consider

What if there was a content platform that offered project management and marketing services at a low cost with a prominent pool of talented writers?
Check out the Content Refined Review to learn more about this fantastic content development opportunity.

Read More